1 million tonnes of wheat
Explore the evidence first. End-2031 is assumed; the speech gives no year. Read the President's claim ↓
- Baseline
- (2024)
- Target
- by end-2031, assumed
- Growth needed
- a year
- Best on record
- a year
- Needed ÷ best
- stretchproposed
Dotted figures open their receipts: the source, its date and how each number is calculated.
To firm up the wheat baseline (C4), we would need to confirm the press-reported forecast and irrigated share against official evidence. Historical observations and forecasts remain separate scenarios. Inspect the evidence ↓
The record
Focus the chart and use Left and Right to read each year; Home and End jump to its limits.
- Recorded
- Required path
- Best pace on record, carried forward (not a forecast)
- Target
Source: Wheat production CSV (OWID). Source note: OWID/FAOSTAT-derived; yield 7.09 t/ha in 2024. Lines join consecutive years only; a gap means no figure for that year. The dashed line is arithmetic, not a forecast: the fastest 5-year growth on record (rebounds from a collapse left out), continued from the baseline.
Data table (15 points)
| Period | tonnes |
|---|---|
| 2010 | 172,256 |
| 2011 | 237,332 |
| 2012 | 253,522 |
| 2013 | 273,584 |
| 2014 | 201,504 |
| 2015 | 214,230 |
| 2016 | 159,533 |
| 2017 | 193,713 |
| 2018 | 114,463 |
| 2019 | 151,850 |
| 2020 | 191,620 |
| 2021 | 205,882 |
| 2022 | 234,925 |
| 2023 | 277,492 |
| 2024 | 198,886 |
The claim
1 million tonnes of wheat
Baseline audit
Wheat production
verification caveatWheat: 129,524 t (2024/25 MoA forecast); 81,822 t (2025/26, press); record 277,492 t (2023, FAOSTAT-derived)
- Against the speech
- 1 Mt is about 3.6x the record.
- Where it comes from
- MoA statement (primary) for 2024/25; 2025/26 is secondary press on a crop not yet harvested
- What would make it wrong
- The ZamStats national wheat figure and the irrigated share.
All 8 records for C4
| Value | What it is | As of | Source | Tag | Re-opened |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81,822 | t, 2025/26 (a forecast of the crop still to be harvested) “81,822 MT of wheat” | 26 May 2026 | National Food Balance article secondary · CR:S4 | L · Verification pending: secondary or unopened | No independent recheck logged |
| 129,523.51 | t, 2024/25 forecast; area 17,822.28 ha; down from 198,886 t on 28,052 ha “production will stand at 129,523.51 metric tonnes in the current season” | 2024/25 | Ministerial Statement, 2024/25 crop yield primary · CR:S10 | V · Primary source opened | No independent recheck logged |
| 17,822.28 | ha wheat area, 2024/25 forecast | 2024/25 | Ministerial Statement, 2024/25 crop yield primary · CR:S10 | V · Primary source opened | No independent recheck logged |
| 198,886 | t wheat, 2023/24 (the 2024 harvest the wheat page's pace starts from) | 2023/24 | Ministerial Statement, 2024/25 crop yield primary · CR:S10 | V · Primary source opened | No independent recheck logged |
| 28,052 | ha wheat area, 2023/24 | 2023/24 | Ministerial Statement, 2024/25 crop yield primary · CR:S10 | V · Primary source opened | No independent recheck logged |
| 358,318 | t National Food Balance deficit, 2026/27 marketing season (327,938 t for 2025/26) | 26 May 2026 / 22 May 2025 | National Food Balance article secondary · CR:S4 | L · Verification pending: secondary or unopened | No independent recheck logged |
| 100,000 | t wheat imports approved by Cabinet after a 2015 ban | 18 Mar 2024 | Cabinet allows wheat imports secondary · CR:S41 | L · Verification pending: secondary or unopened | No independent recheck logged |
| 25,000 to 50,000 | t/y: Zambeef Mpongwe wheat milling capacity doubling (flour tonnes; US$12m) | 11 Oct 2024 | Zambeef Mpongwe wheat mill secondary · CR:S43 | L · Verification pending: secondary or unopened | No independent recheck logged |
Conflicts and cautions (4), reported, never averaged
- 2024/25 wheat: 129,524 t (MoA forecast) vs 250 kt (USDA/IndexMundi MY2024); the USDA series is flat and not independent.
- PDU labels 114,000 t as 2019, whereas OWID has it at 2018 (114,463).
- Target year for 1 Mt: 2031 (PDU S22) vs 2027 (PDU 'Zambia's wheat revolution').
- An opposition commentary says 250,000 t from 35,000 ha (about 7.1 t/ha): opinion, conflicting with MoA 2024/25.
What the target implies
26.0%growth a year, for 7 years
From 198,886 (2024) to 1 million by the end of 2031: 5.0x the baseline.
- Best sustained pace on record
- 20.4% a year (2006-2011, 5-year window)
- Required ÷ best
- 1.3x stretchproposed
- Without the 25% base rule
- best 20.4% (2006-2011), ratio 1.3x stretchproposed
The speech states no year; end-2031 is our assumption, the end of the five years the speech refers to. The 25% rule leaves out growth from a collapsed base (an analyst choice, not yet adopted). Bands are a proposal, not a forecast or a probability.
Note on the baseline: base is the 2024 value; the 2025/26 forecast is 81,822 t (secondary); no official national baseline
Copy this page's address to share the assumed year and baseline choice.
Capital and delivery
Band, and what would change it
A band compares the required pace with the best pace on record. It is arithmetic, not a forecast and not a probability. The band rule is a proposal, not yet adopted.
| Target | end-2028 | end-2029 | end-2030 | end-2031 | end-2032 | end-2033 | end-2034 | end-2035 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| From the 2024 harvestbeyond precedent to 2028 · stretch 2029-2032 · on pace from 2033 | 2.4x beyond precedent | 1.9x stretch | 1.5x stretch | 1.3x stretch | 1.1x stretch | 1.0x on pace | 0.9x on pace | 0.8x on pace |
| From the 2025/26 forecast (press)beyond precedent to 2033 · stretch from 2034 | 12.3x beyond precedent | 6.4x beyond precedent | 4.3x beyond precedent | 3.2x beyond precedent | 2.5x beyond precedent | 2.1x beyond precedent | 1.8x stretch | 1.6x stretch |
- Confidence in the baseline
- Medium-low. The MoA series is solid to 2024/25, but 2025/26 is a forecast and the requirements are implied.
- What would change it
- The ZamStats national wheat figure and the irrigated share.
These are provisional readings of the cited evidence. See the notes above and what we would need to check to strengthen the comparisons.